Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

CC2020 Database Feedback: Indian 20 Over

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • CC2020 Database Feedback: Indian 20 Over

    I'm currently encountering a bug with vBulletin that is stopping me from creating a new forum, so will put the threads here and then carry them over.

    Bowling speeds are:

    RM > RFM > RMF > RF

    If somebody should be a Chinaman, let me know.

    All squads should be accuracte as of 1st April and how the season should have been played out.

    Bangalore:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Bangalore #1.jpg
Views:	599
Size:	339.2 KB
ID:	69519Click image for larger version

Name:	Bangalore #2.jpg
Views:	477
Size:	341.0 KB
ID:	69520

    Chennai:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Chennai #1.jpg
Views:	446
Size:	338.4 KB
ID:	69521Click image for larger version

Name:	Chennai #2.jpg
Views:	441
Size:	339.8 KB
ID:	69522

    Delhi:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Delhi #1.jpg
Views:	442
Size:	335.2 KB
ID:	69523Click image for larger version

Name:	Delhi #2.jpg
Views:	434
Size:	340.3 KB
ID:	69524

    Hyderabad:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Hyderabad #1.jpg
Views:	456
Size:	337.8 KB
ID:	69525Click image for larger version

Name:	Hyderabd #2.jpg
Views:	437
Size:	339.9 KB
ID:	69526

    Kolkata:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Kolkata #1.jpg
Views:	439
Size:	331.8 KB
ID:	69527Click image for larger version

Name:	Kolkata #2.jpg
Views:	431
Size:	333.9 KB
ID:	69528

    Mumbai:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Mumbai #1.jpg
Views:	452
Size:	335.7 KB
ID:	69529Click image for larger version

Name:	Mumbai #2.jpg
Views:	436
Size:	338.7 KB
ID:	69530

    Punjab:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Punjab #1.jpg
Views:	447
Size:	336.7 KB
ID:	69531Click image for larger version

Name:	Punjab #2.jpg
Views:	436
Size:	339.8 KB
ID:	69532

    Rajasthan:

    Click image for larger version

Name:	Rajasthan #1.jpg
Views:	457
Size:	333.4 KB
ID:	69533Click image for larger version

Name:	Rajasthan #2.jpg
Views:	444
Size:	336.0 KB
ID:	69534




  • #2
    D Paddikal(banglore) is Avg/Agg not Def Changed to average.

    R Singh (kolkata) is Agg not V.Agg Changed to agg.
    Tom Banton (kolkata) is definitely V.Agg As per my comments in the Eng thread, I will be leaving as just aggressive as that is a better representation of his SRs across all match types.

    Kl Rahul (Punjab) is definitely Agg I'm going to keep him as average as that is a better representation of his SRs across all match types.

    I hope that the system where the AI choose allrounders instead of good bowlers is fixed, you don't need 4 all-rounders to strengthen your batting,
    Also the AI is not choosing spin bowlers in playing 11 that should be fixed.

    Thankyou
    Last edited by Sureshot; 06-10-2020, 12:38 PM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Bengaluru
      G Singh - Gurkeerat I assume - Agg Changed
      Saini - RF Changed

      Chennai
      Gaikwad - Avg Fair call, improved SRs recently.
      Bravo - Agg His SRs don't support being above average.
      K Sharma - Avg His SRs don't support being above defensive.
      Thakur - RMF Left as per Dhruv's comment below.

      Hyderabad
      Saha - Avg His career SRs are very much Def, not sure the smaller recent data samples support average.
      Nabi - def Agg Fair call, changed.
      A Sharma - Avg Changed
      V Shankar - RM Changed


      Last edited by Sureshot; 06-12-2020, 12:10 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by ruby23 View Post
        Bengaluru
        G Singh - Gurkeerat I assume - Agg
        Saini - RF

        Chennai
        Gaikwad - Avg
        Bravo - Agg
        K Sharma - Avg
        Thakur - RMF

        Hyderabad
        Saha - Avg
        Nabi - def Agg
        A Sharma - Avg
        V Shankar - RM


        Speeds RF>RMF>RFM>RM

        Thakur is not RMF, he bowls around 130-135
        Nabi is def Agg

        Comment


        • #5
          Sorry it's off topic but,
          My other concern of importance is why doesn't AI select the playing 11 which plays in real world, why it's criteria for selection of a team is different.
          please take a look at it and the playing 11 should also depend on conditions, like dry pitch and cracks means an extra spinner

          Comment


          • #6
            P Deshpande (Bang) Agg rating should be aggressive or atleast avg going by his OD and T20 SRs of 96 and 149 Changed to Aggressive
            K Paul (Del) should be Agg at best. His OD and T20 Srs are 83 and 116 His stats are unusual because his FC SR is 70, I've dropped him to aggressive.
            S Iyer (Del) is a leg spinner as per cricinfo Changed, seen a video and it looks like leg-spin.
            D Deshmukh (Mum) is RFM as per cricinfo Confirmed in video, changed.
            R Chahar (Mum) should be agg Early in his career, but would agree with his OD/20over SRs.
            M Singh (Pun) should be RM Changed
            KL Rahul (Pun) should be agg. His ODI and T20I SRs are 87 and 146. As a combination of his SRs, I feel average is better suited. Kept him as is.
            R Bishnoi (Pun) is a leg spinner. Should be highly rated as per U19 records. Changed
            A Joshi (Raj) should be agg as OD and T20 SRs are 86 and 146 Small sample size, no FC record. 86 is an average ODI SR nowadays, I'll be leaving as average.
            O Thomas (Raj) should be RF Changed
            C Woakes (Del) has withdrawn from IPL stint for this year. So should be removed from the squad. Removed (he withdrew in March, before our April cutoff)
            Last edited by Sureshot; 06-14-2020, 04:49 PM.

            Comment


            • #7
              @sureshot: M. Shami (Punjab) should definitely be RF rather than RMF. He regularly bowls over 145 kph (he's on par with Bumrah with his speeds)

              Comment

              Working...
              X